We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Pre-Fiat vs. Post Fiat Kritik Implications Debate, Cost Benefit Analysis Criterion, or Just Water the House Plant?: National Parliamentary Tournament of Excellence Judging Paradigms.
- Authors
Swift, Crystal-Lane
- Abstract
This paper analyzes judging paradigms submitted for the National Parliamentary Tournament of Excellence (NPTE). The method for analysis is a simple coding strategy. Common themes are described and criticized. A sketch of the 2005 NPTE judges is illustrated. Categories include: the tabula rasa judge, the kritikal judge, the ultra-liberal judge, the stockissue judge, the communication-centered judge, and the interventionalist. The frequencies of judging style as well as the implications of the way judges claim to view debate are offered. Finally, implications of these different styles on debaters are proposed and recommendations are made for NPTE debaters.
- Publication
Forensic, 2007, Vol 92, Issue 2, p27
- ISSN
0015-735X
- Publication type
Academic Journal