We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Teething signs and symptoms: persisting misconceptions among health professionals in New Zealand.
- Authors
Ispas, Rares S.; Mahoney, Erin K.; Whyman, Robin A.
- Abstract
Objectives: To investigate current beliefs and treatment recommendations for teething symptoms among health professionals in New Zealand. Design: Cross-sectional survey of seven groups of health professionals. Method: A written questionnaire was mailed in March 2011 to 336 health professionals practising in Wellington City, Hütt Valley and Kapiti Coast, in New Zealand. The self-administered questionnaire sought information on how many children are perceived to experience teething symptoms, what symptoms are attributed to teething, suggested treatments for teething symptoms, and how distressing teething is to children and parents. Results: The response rate to the single-wave survey was 41%. Although the beliefs varied widely across the groups, almost half (48%) of health professionals believed that some children have teething-associated problems, and 32% believed that most children do. Just over one-third of participants incorrectly attributed fever to teething. Health professionals also incorrectly chose nappy rash (31%), loose stools (27%), runny nose (19%) and mouth ulcers (15%) as teething signs or symptoms. Most participants (65%) suggested paracetamol as a treatment for teething; 60% chose teething gels and 48% suggested teething toys or rings. Most respondents believed that teething is moderately distressing to both the child and parent. Conclusions: The findings show that misconceptions about the symptoms of teething are held by some health professionals. Many believe that teething causes a variety of serious and systemic symptoms. The study has also shown that teething beliefs vary greatly across the different health professions.
- Publication
New Zealand Dental Journal, 2013, Vol 109, Issue 1, p2
- ISSN
0028-8047
- Publication type
Academic Journal