We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
How Many Is Too Few? Revisiting the Number of Names in Equity Portfolios.
- Authors
Bender, Jennifer; Sun, Xiaole
- Abstract
Concentration in global equity markets has been on a remarkable rise recently, leading to questions about whether benchmark indexes are properly diversified and whether portfolios that track or are benchmarked to these indexes are appropriately diversified. Mean-variance optimization has long been used to build equity portfolios, and there is general acceptance that the resulting portfolios are well diversified from a risk perspective. But from a holdings perspective, there is far less clarity. This article explores what determines the optimal number of names in equity portfolios. First, the authors note that benchmark-relative portfolios need to hold a far greater number of names than non-benchmarked portfolios. Second, for active portfolios including quantitative, factor, and thematic portfolios, the optimal number of names is affected by several key inputs: expected tracking error, the cross-sectional weight distribution for the securities in the benchmark and the distribution of stock-level alphas (or exposures for smart beta or thematic portfolios), and the covariance matrix. The authors discuss the subsequent implications and conclude by noting that in periods of rising market concentration, the optimal number of names for active equity portfolios generally falls.
- Publication
Journal of Portfolio Management, 2024, Vol 50, Issue 4, p7
- ISSN
0095-4918
- Publication type
Academic Journal
- DOI
10.3905/jpm.2023.1.562